Lynch -v- Cooney & anor [2016] IECA 1 (13 January 2016)

Lynch -v- Cooney & anor [2016] IECA 1 (13 January 2016)

The trial judge's findings of fact were inconsistent and insufficiently reasoned, failing to properly engage with the evidence and conflicting witness accounts, thus constituting material error warranting appellate intervention.

Citation
[2016] IECA 1
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Rowena Lynch; Defendant/respondent: Patrick Cooney; Defendant/respondent: Trevor Winckworth
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
13 January 2016
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Allow appeal and set aside High Court decision; remittal for re-trial
Legal Topics
Duty of Care, Assessment of Evidence, Findings of Fact, Appeal Standards
Tort Personal Injury Civil Procedure Duty of Care Assessment of Evidence Findings of Fact Appeal Standards

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rowena Lynch

Plaintiff/appellant

Patrick Cooney

Defendant/respondent

Trevor Winckworth

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding the assault did not occur within the club premises
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge properly assessed and engaged with the evidence
  3. 3 Scope of appellate review of findings of fact

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's findings of fact were inconsistent and insufficiently reasoned, failing to properly engage with the evidence and conflicting witness accounts, thus constituting material error warranting appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Allow appeal and set aside High Court decision; remittal for re-trial

Orders

  • Case remitted to High Court for complete re-trial