H. (E.) v. M. (J.) [2000] IEHC 40 (4th April, 2000)
The court held that joint custody and guardianship best served the children's welfare, that both parents should share financial responsibilities proportionally, and that the injunction on the respondent's property should be lifted subject to an undertaking to build a suitable home for the children within three years.
- Citation
- [2000] IEHC 40
- Parties
- Applicant: E. H.; Respondent: J. M.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Circuit Court property injunction reversed with conditions; maintenance and custody orders varied.
- Legal Topics
- Custody, Maintenance, Separation Agreement, Child Welfare, Property Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E. H.
Applicant
J. M.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether joint custody and guardianship should be retained
- 2 Whether maintenance and financial orders made by the Circuit Court were appropriate
- 3 Whether the property injunction over the respondent's site should be lifted
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that joint custody and guardianship best served the children's welfare, that both parents should share financial responsibilities proportionally, and that the injunction on the respondent's property should be lifted subject to an undertaking to build a suitable home for the children within three years.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Circuit Court property injunction reversed with conditions; maintenance and custody orders varied.
Orders
- Joint custody and guardianship of children retained by both parties.
- Applicant to retain children's allowance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment