H. (E.) v. M. (J.) [2000] IEHC 40 (4th April, 2000)

H. (E.) v. M. (J.) [2000] IEHC 40 (4th April, 2000)

The court held that joint custody and guardianship best served the children's welfare, that both parents should share financial responsibilities proportionally, and that the injunction on the respondent's property should be lifted subject to an undertaking to build a suitable home for the children within three years.

Citation
[2000] IEHC 40
Parties
Applicant: E. H.; Respondent: J. M.
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Circuit Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; Circuit Court property injunction reversed with conditions; maintenance and custody orders varied.
Legal Topics
Custody, Maintenance, Separation Agreement, Child Welfare, Property Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

E. H.

Applicant

J. M.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Circuit Court

  1. 1 Whether joint custody and guardianship should be retained
  2. 2 Whether maintenance and financial orders made by the Circuit Court were appropriate
  3. 3 Whether the property injunction over the respondent's site should be lifted

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that joint custody and guardianship best served the children's welfare, that both parents should share financial responsibilities proportionally, and that the injunction on the respondent's property should be lifted subject to an undertaking to build a suitable home for the children within three years.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; Circuit Court property injunction reversed with conditions; maintenance and custody orders varied.

Orders

  • Joint custody and guardianship of children retained by both parties.
  • Applicant to retain children's allowance.