Mc E. -v- O'S. [2009] IEHC 52 (05 February 2009)
Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction under s. 11 Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 to order lump sum for accommodation for non-marital child; applicant's claim under s. 42 Family Law Act 1995 refused as not properly pleaded; maintenance for non-marital child allowed under s. 5A Family Law (Maintenance of Spouses and Children) Act 1976; carers allowance not permitted.
- Citation
- [2009] IEHC 52
- Parties
- Applicant: E. M c E.; Respondent/appellant: J. O’S.; Notice Party: G. O’S.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Circuit Court Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Guardianship of Infants, Maintenance of Non Marital Children, Property Adjustment Orders, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E. M c E.
Applicant
J. O’S.
Respondent/appellant
G. O’S.
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Circuit Court Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 jurisdiction to order lump sum for accommodation under Guardianship of Infants Act 1964
- 2 jurisdiction to order lump sum under Family Law Act 1995
- 3 maintenance entitlement for non-marital child under Family Law (Maintenance of Spouses and Children) Act 1976
Ratio Decidendi
Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction under s. 11 Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 to order lump sum for accommodation for non-marital child; applicant's claim under s. 42 Family Law Act 1995 refused as not properly pleaded; maintenance for non-marital child allowed under s. 5A Family Law (Maintenance of Spouses and Children) Act 1976; carers allowance not permitted.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Circuit Court order for €500,000 lump sum discharged
- Respondent to pay €1,200 per month maintenance for child P.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment