Eircell Ltd. v. Leitrim County Council [1999] IEHC 1; [2000] 1 IR 479; [2000] 2 ILRM 81 (26th March, 1999)
The elected members of the Respondent Council failed to sufficiently inform themselves of relevant circumstances and did not observe principles of constitutional justice and fair procedures, including giving prior notification and opportunity to make submissions. Their decision to revoke planning permission was invalid as it did not comply with statutory requirements and constitutional justice.
- Citation
- [2000] 2 ILRM 81
- Parties
- Applicant: Eircell Limited; Respondent: Leitrim County Council
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Planning Permission, Fair Procedures, Natural Justice, Ultra Vires Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eircell Limited
Applicant
Leitrim County Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the revocation of planning permission was valid under Section 30 of the Local Government (Planning and Development) Act 1963
- 2 Whether principles of constitutional justice and fair procedures were observed
- 3 Whether a change in circumstances relating to proper planning and development occurred
Ratio Decidendi
The elected members of the Respondent Council failed to sufficiently inform themselves of relevant circumstances and did not observe principles of constitutional justice and fair procedures, including giving prior notification and opportunity to make submissions. Their decision to revoke planning permission was invalid as it did not comply with statutory requirements and constitutional justice.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Declaration that the revocation order and notice were ultra vires, invalid, and of no legal effect
- Order of certiorari quashing the revocation order and notice
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment