Environmental Protection Agency -v- Harte Peat Ltd & anor [2014] IEHC 308 (30 May 2014)
The 50 hectare threshold for requiring an IPPC licence under the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 (as amended) refers to the area of the business involved in peat extraction, not just the area of extraction. All land used for or incidental to extraction (including access roads, storage, buffer zones,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] IEHC 308
- Parties
- Applicant: Environmental Protection Agency; Respondent: Harte Peat Limited; Respondent: Lismoher Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Interpretation/application Under Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 (as Amended) / High Court Judgment on Agreed Issues
- Outcome
- Declaratory judgment in favour of the EPA's interpretation; issues determined as per court's answers to agreed questions.
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Impact Assessment, Peat Extraction Regulation, Aggregation of Land for Licensing, Corporate Veil Lifting, Interpretation of EU Derived Statutes
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Environmental Protection Agency
Applicant
Harte Peat Limited
Respondent
Lismoher Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Statutory Interpretation/application Under Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 (as Amended) / High Court Judgment on Agreed Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of the 50 hectare threshold for peat extraction under the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 (as amended)
- 2 Aggregation of areas and identity of operator for licensing thresholds
- 3 Definition and scope of 'installation' and 'activity' under the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The 50 hectare threshold for requiring an IPPC licence under the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 (as amended) refers to the area of the business involved in peat extraction, not just the area of extraction. All land used for or incidental to extraction (including access roads, storage, buffer zones, sedimentation ponds, etc.) must be included in the calculation. Aggregation is required across multiple sites and companies where there is a practical or technical connection, and the true identity of the operator must be considered, including lifting the corporate veil if necessary, to prevent circumvention of environmental protection objectives. The court's interpretation is guided...
Court Disposition
Declaratory judgment in favour of the EPA's interpretation; issues determined as per court's answers to agreed questions.
Orders
- The 50 hectare threshold applies to the area of the business, not just extraction.
- Aggregation of areas is required across sites and companies where there is a technical or practical connection.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment