Fingal County Council -v- William P. Keeling & Sons Ltd. [2005] IESC 55 (29 July 2005)
A developer is not estopped from claiming that a development is exempted merely because he applied for planning permission for retention; Tallaght Block is not a binding precedent for estoppel in these circumstances.
- Citation
- [2005] IESC 55
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Fingal County Council; Defendant/appellant: William P. Keeling & Sons Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Preliminary Issue Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed - High Court order set aside
- Legal Topics
- Estoppel, Exempted Development, Planning Permission, Precedent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fingal County Council
Plaintiff/respondent
William P. Keeling & Sons Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Preliminary Issue Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a developer is estopped from claiming exempted development solely because he applied for retention planning permission
Ratio Decidendi
A developer is not estopped from claiming that a development is exempted merely because he applied for planning permission for retention; Tallaght Block is not a binding precedent for estoppel in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed - High Court order set aside
Orders
- Appellant not estopped from claiming exemption
- Matter remitted for further consideration in High Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment