McCool -v- Monaghan [2015] IEHC 700 (09 November 2015)
There was no compelling evidence before the Tribunal of deliberate misconduct or conspiracy by the respondent solicitor; the Tribunal was entitled to rely on the affidavits and documentation before it, and its decision was not vitiated by serious or significant error.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 700
- Parties
- Appellant: Eugene McCool; Respondent: Colin Monaghan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Misconduct, Disciplinary Proceedings, Tribunal Review, Appeal Standard, Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eugene McCool
Appellant
Colin Monaghan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal erred in finding no prima facie case of misconduct against the respondent solicitor
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to properly investigate conflicting evidence regarding alleged misleading conduct by the respondent solicitor
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's decision was vitiated by serious or significant error
Ratio Decidendi
There was no compelling evidence before the Tribunal of deliberate misconduct or conspiracy by the respondent solicitor; the Tribunal was entitled to rely on the affidavits and documentation before it, and its decision was not vitiated by serious or significant error.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment