In the Matter of Gallium Ltd (t/aFirst Equitity Group) and in the matter of the Companies (Amendment) Act 1990 [2009] IESC 8 (03 February 2009)
The Supreme Court held that, in light of the independent accountant's report, the withdrawal of creditor opposition, and the absence of prejudice to creditors, there was sufficient evidence to satisfy the statutory requirement of a reasonable prospect of survival. The comparative disadvantage to creditors in liquidation and the support for examinership justified the appointment of an examiner. The High Court's concerns had been addressed by new evidence and explanations, and the statutory threshold was met.
- Citation
- [2009] IESC 8
- Parties
- Appellant/petitioner: Gallium Limited Trading as First Equity Group; Interim Examiner/respondent: Kieran Wallace (Interim Examiner); Principal Secured Creditor: Bank of Scotland Ireland; Secured Creditor: AIB Bank plc; Creditor: Revenue Commissioners; Creditor/objector (withdrew Opposition): Barry Lyons; Creditors/supporters: Other unsecured creditors
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Company Law Examinership Petition / Appeal From High Court Refusal of Examinership; Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; order of High Court set aside; examiner appointed
- Legal Topics
- Examinership, Appointment of Examiner, Reasonable Prospect of Survival, Creditor Interests, Independent Accountant's Report
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gallium Limited Trading as First Equity Group
Appellant/petitioner
Kieran Wallace (Interim Examiner)
Interim Examiner/respondent
Bank of Scotland Ireland
Principal Secured Creditor
AIB Bank plc
Secured Creditor
Revenue Commissioners
Creditor
Barry Lyons
Creditor/objector (withdrew Opposition)
Other unsecured creditors
Creditors/supporters
Procedural Posture
Company Law Examinership Petition / Appeal From High Court Refusal of Examinership; Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the company has a reasonable prospect of survival as a going concern under section 2(2) of the Companies (Amendment) Act 1990 as amended
- 2 Whether the High Court erred in refusing the petition for examinership based on the evidence before it
- 3 What standard of proof and discretion applies to the appointment of an examiner
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that, in light of the independent accountant's report, the withdrawal of creditor opposition, and the absence of prejudice to creditors, there was sufficient evidence to satisfy the statutory requirement of a reasonable prospect of survival. The comparative disadvantage to creditors in liquidation and the support for examinership justified the appointment of an examiner. The High Court's concerns had been addressed by new evidence and explanations, and the statutory threshold was met.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; order of High Court set aside; examiner appointed
Orders
- Appointment of Kieran Wallace as examiner to Gallium Limited
- Court protection granted to the company under examinership
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment