Cahill May Roberts Ltd / Elizabeth Arden Ltd [1999] IECA 537 (22nd February, 1999)
The agreement does not contain blacklisted clauses, the parties' market shares are below the relevant threshold, and the arrangement is functionally similar to permitted vertical distribution agreements. Therefore, the notified agreement does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1999] IECA 537
- Parties
- Notifying Party: Cahill May Roberts Ltd; Other Party: Elizabeth Arden Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- certificate granted; agreement does not contravene Section 4(1)
- Legal Topics
- Exclusive Distribution Agreement, Commercial Agency, Market Share, Vertical Agreements, Section 4 Competition Act 1991
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cahill May Roberts Ltd
Notifying Party
Elizabeth Arden Ltd
Other Party
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notified agency agreement between Elizabeth Arden Ltd and Cahill May Roberts Ltd contravenes Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement does not contain blacklisted clauses, the parties' market shares are below the relevant threshold, and the arrangement is functionally similar to permitted vertical distribution agreements. Therefore, the notified agreement does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
certificate granted; agreement does not contravene Section 4(1)
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement between Elizabeth Arden Ltd and Cahill May Roberts Ltd does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment