Power/ Cleary [1994] IECA 277 (4th February, 1994)
The lease agreement, including its restrictive and exclusive user clauses, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in the State and therefore does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1994] IECA 277
- Parties
- Landlord: Rita Power; Tenant: Frederick Cleary; Tenant: Mary Cleary
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- certificate issued
- Legal Topics
- Exclusive Lease Clauses, Restrictive Covenants, Anti Competitive Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rita Power
Landlord
Frederick Cleary
Tenant
Mary Cleary
Tenant
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lease agreement between Rita Power and Frederick and Mary Cleary contains clauses that prevent, restrict, or distort competition contrary to Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The lease agreement, including its restrictive and exclusive user clauses, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in the State and therefore does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
certificate issued
Orders
- Certificate issued stating the agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment