William Neville & Sons Ltd/ John Sutton [1993] IECA 88 (5th October, 1993)
The notified letting agreement, including its restrictive and exclusive user clauses, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or any part of the State, and therefore does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1993] IECA 88
- Parties
- Landlord: William Neville & Sons Limited; Tenant: John Sutton
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- certificate issued
- Legal Topics
- Exclusive Letting Agreement, Restrictive Covenants, Anti Competitive Agreements, Section 4 Competition Act 1991
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Neville & Sons Limited
Landlord
John Sutton
Tenant
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the letting agreement and its restrictive/exclusive user clauses prevent, restrict or distort competition contrary to Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The notified letting agreement, including its restrictive and exclusive user clauses, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or any part of the State, and therefore does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
certificate issued
Orders
- Certificate issued stating the agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment