Eugenie T. Stokes/Anthony Patterson & Cassandra Collins [1993] IECA 237 (15th December, 1993)
The notified agreement does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991 because the sale was completed prior to the Act and the exclusive user clause does not restrict competition.
- Citation
- [1993] IECA 237
- Parties
- Grantor: Eugenie T. Stokes; Grantee: Anthony Patterson; Grantee: Cassandra Collins
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Decision
- Outcome
- certificate issued
- Legal Topics
- Exclusive User Clause, Shopping Centre Leases, Agreement Between Undertakings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Eugenie T. Stokes
Grantor
Anthony Patterson
Grantee
Cassandra Collins
Grantee
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale agreement and exclusive user clause offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The notified agreement does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991 because the sale was completed prior to the Act and the exclusive user clause does not restrict competition.
Court Disposition
certificate issued
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment