Douglas Developments Ltd/ Peter Mark [1993] IECA 61 (5th October, 1993)
The notified lease, including its restricted and exclusive user clauses, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or any part of the State. Therefore, it does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991.
- Citation
- [1993] IECA 61
- Parties
- Landlord: Douglas Developments Ltd; Tenant: Peter Mark
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4 of the Competition Act 1991
- Outcome
- Certificate issued that the agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Exclusive User Clauses, Shopping Centre Leases, Anti Competitive Agreements, Section 4 Competition Act 1991
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Douglas Developments Ltd
Landlord
Peter Mark
Tenant
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4 of the Competition Act 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lease agreement between Douglas Developments Ltd and Peter Mark contains clauses that prevent, restrict or distort competition contrary to Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The notified lease, including its restricted and exclusive user clauses, does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or any part of the State. Therefore, it does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991.
Court Disposition
Certificate issued that the agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991.
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement between Douglas Developments Ltd and Peter Mark in relation to the lease of Unit 15, Douglas Court Shopping Centre, does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment