Pepper Finance Corp v Cannon & Anor (Rev 1) [2020] IESC 2 (04 February 2020)
The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the High Court on a Circuit Court appeal post-33rd Amendment if constitutional criteria are met. The Éire Continental criteria for extension of time to appeal remain applicable and were not satisfied by the appellants, who failed to form an intention to appeal within time or show a relevant mistake. EU law does not require a recalibration of these criteria, as national time-limits are not rendered impossible or excessively difficult by their application. The County Registrar was aware of her obligations under the Directive and Regulations, and there was no evidence of unfairness in the mortgage terms that would justify extending...
- Citation
- [2020] IESC 2
- Parties
- Respondent/plaintiff: Pepper Finance Corporation (Ireland) DAC; Appellant/defendant: Brian Cannon; Appellant/defendant: Christina Cannon
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision on Circuit Court Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time to Appeal, Unfair Contract Terms, Mortgage Possession, EU Law in National Courts, Finality of Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pepper Finance Corporation (Ireland) DAC
Respondent/plaintiff
Brian Cannon
Appellant/defendant
Christina Cannon
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision on Circuit Court Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Supreme Court have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the High Court on a Circuit Court appeal post-33rd Amendment?
- 2 What are the criteria for extending time to appeal under Éire Continental?
- 3 Does EU law require recalibration of national time-limit rules for appeals in consumer contract cases?
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the High Court on a Circuit Court appeal post-33rd Amendment if constitutional criteria are met. The Éire Continental criteria for extension of time to appeal remain applicable and were not satisfied by the appellants, who failed to form an intention to appeal within time or show a relevant mistake. EU law does not require a recalibration of these criteria, as national time-limits are not rendered impossible or excessively difficult by their application. The County Registrar was aware of her obligations under the Directive and Regulations, and there was no evidence of unfairness in the mortgage terms that would justify extending...
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Refusal to extend time to appeal affirmed
- No further order as to costs stated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment