A.(F.) v. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform & Ors [2001] IEHC 217 (21 December 2001)

A.(F.) v. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform & Ors [2001] IEHC 217 (21 December 2001)

The High Court found that the standard of proof applied by the respondents ('reasonable likelihood') was consistent with international and domestic law and did not amount to an error of law. The process afforded to the applicant, including the appeal, was found to be procedurally fair and independent in substance, and the applicant was provided with the relevant evidence and reasons. The applicant's delay in bringing the application was not excused by sufficient cause. Accordingly, the applicant was not entitled to the relief sought.

Citation
[2001] IEHC 217
Parties
Applicant: F A; First Respondent: Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform; Second Respondent: Appeals Authority of Ireland; Third Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
21 December 2001
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment on Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Status Refusal
Outcome
Application for judicial review refused
Legal Topics
Refugee Status Determination, Standard of Proof in Asylum Claims, Procedural Fairness, Bias and Independence of Decision Makers, Delay in Judicial Review
Immigration Law Administrative Law Human Rights Law Refugee Status Determination Standard of Proof in Asylum Claims Procedural Fairness Bias and Independence of Decision Makers Delay in Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

F A

Applicant

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform

First Respondent

Appeals Authority of Ireland

Second Respondent

Attorney General

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / High Court Judgment on Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Status Refusal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant received a fair and independent appeal of the refusal of refugee status
  2. 2 Whether the standard of proof applied by the respondents was correct under Irish and international law
  3. 3 Whether the appeals process was tainted by bias or lack of independence

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the standard of proof applied by the respondents ('reasonable likelihood') was consistent with international and domestic law and did not amount to an error of law. The process afforded to the applicant, including the appeal, was found to be procedurally fair and independent in substance, and the applicant was provided with the relevant evidence and reasons. The applicant's delay in bringing the application was not excused by sufficient cause. Accordingly, the applicant was not entitled to the relief sought.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review refused

Orders

  • Relief sought by the applicant is denied
  • No order of certiorari or prohibition granted