K. (F.M.) v. H. (G.) [2005] IEHC 125 (15 April 2005)
The affidavit content objected to was relevant and admissible for the section 2 application and its incorporation into pleadings was legitimate; it is not prejudicial or scandalous. Discovery is granted for categories of documents relevant to the issues as defined in the pleadings, with modifications to the terms sought.
- Citation
- [2005] IEHC 125
- Parties
- Plaintiff: F. M. K; Defendant: G. H.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Motions (discovery and Striking Out Affidavit Content)
- Outcome
- Defendant's motion to strike out affidavit content refused; discovery granted in modified terms for relevant categories.
- Legal Topics
- Proceeds of Crime, Discovery, Admissibility of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F. M. K
Plaintiff
G. H.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Motions (discovery and Striking Out Affidavit Content)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether paragraphs 9 and 10 of T. F.'s affidavit should be struck out as irrelevant, prejudicial, or scandalous
- 2 Whether discovery should be ordered for specified categories of documents
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit content objected to was relevant and admissible for the section 2 application and its incorporation into pleadings was legitimate; it is not prejudicial or scandalous. Discovery is granted for categories of documents relevant to the issues as defined in the pleadings, with modifications to the terms sought.
Court Disposition
Defendant's motion to strike out affidavit content refused; discovery granted in modified terms for relevant categories.
Orders
- Discovery ordered for specified categories of documents as modified by the court.
- Refusal to strike out paragraphs 9 and 10 of T. F.'s affidavit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment