McK. (F.) v. M. (B.) & Anor [2006] IEHC 395 (3 November 2006)
The existence of Austrian proceedings and orders does not bar the Irish High Court from making a Disposal Order under section 4 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996 in respect of funds held in Austria, as the court acts in personam over parties within its jurisdiction and does not determine questions of Austrian law.
- Citation
- [2006] IEHC 395
- Parties
- Applicant: F McK; Respondent: B M; Respondent: K M
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Special Summons / Judgment on Motion to Dismiss and Substantive Application for Disposal Order
- Outcome
- Application to dismiss refused; applicant permitted to proceed with application for Disposal Order.
- Legal Topics
- Proceeds of Crime, Jurisdiction, Comity of Courts, Enforcement of Foreign Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F McK
Applicant
B M
Respondent
K M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Summons / Judgment on Motion to Dismiss and Substantive Application for Disposal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court of Ireland can make a Disposal Order under section 4 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996 in respect of funds held in Austria, given existing Austrian proceedings and orders
- 2 Whether the proceedings were properly commenced by Special Summons
Ratio Decidendi
The existence of Austrian proceedings and orders does not bar the Irish High Court from making a Disposal Order under section 4 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996 in respect of funds held in Austria, as the court acts in personam over parties within its jurisdiction and does not determine questions of Austrian law.
Court Disposition
Application to dismiss refused; applicant permitted to proceed with application for Disposal Order.
Orders
- Application to dismiss proceedings refused
- Applicant may proceed with application for Disposal Order under section 4 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment