F. -v- G. [2014] IEHC 152 (15 January 2014)
The Irish High Court retains jurisdiction under section 11 of the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 and common law to make mirror orders reflecting foreign custody orders concerning Irish citizen children, even if not habitually resident in Ireland, provided the child's welfare is the paramount consideration. The Protection of Children (Hague Convention) Act 2000 does not exclude such jurisdiction for non-contracting states. There is no evidence of fraud or deceit in the child's acquisition of Irish citizenship or passport. The making of a mirror order is appropriate in this case to give effect to the California order and facilitate the child's welfare, subject to undertakings and the...
- Citation
- [2014] IEHC 152
- Parties
- Applicant: F; Respondent: G
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Guardianship/relocation / High Court Judgment on Application for Mirror Order and Guardianship
- Outcome
- Relief granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Guardianship of Infants, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Custody Orders, Jurisdiction in Child Custody, Mirror Orders, Child Relocation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F
Applicant
G
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Guardianship/relocation / High Court Judgment on Application for Mirror Order and Guardianship
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Irish High Court have jurisdiction to make a 'mirror order' reflecting a California custody order for a child habitually resident in the US but with Irish citizenship?
- 2 Should the Court exercise its discretion to make such an order in the circumstances?
- 3 Is the respondent entitled to be appointed guardian under Irish law?
Ratio Decidendi
The Irish High Court retains jurisdiction under section 11 of the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 and common law to make mirror orders reflecting foreign custody orders concerning Irish citizen children, even if not habitually resident in Ireland, provided the child's welfare is the paramount consideration. The Protection of Children (Hague Convention) Act 2000 does not exclude such jurisdiction for non-contracting states. There is no evidence of fraud or deceit in the child's acquisition of Irish citizenship or passport. The making of a mirror order is appropriate in this case to give effect to the California order and facilitate the child's welfare, subject to undertakings and the...
Court Disposition
Relief granted in part
Orders
- Mirror order made under section 11 of the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 reflecting the operative parts of the California custody order, subject to undertakings by the applicant.
- Order appointing the respondent as guardian of the child under section 6A of the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment