People v. Kavanagh [1997] IEHC 164 (29th October, 1997)
Section 11 of the Criminal Law Act, 1976 does not create a statutory offence of false imprisonment; the accused's explanation of coercion is not credible, and he was a voluntary participant in the robbery and related offences.
- Citation
- [1997] IEHC 164
- Parties
- Accused: Joe Kavanagh; Prosecution: The People (Prosecution)
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- guilty on counts 5, 6 and 7; counts 1, 2 and 3 cannot be considered as offences charged have been abolished by the 1997 Act
- Legal Topics
- False Imprisonment, Robbery, Kidnapping, Coercion, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joe Kavanagh
Accused
The People (Prosecution)
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 11 of the Criminal Law Act, 1976 creates a statutory offence of false imprisonment
- 2 Whether the accused was coerced into participation in the robbery
- 3 Whether the accused's explanation creates reasonable doubt as to his guilt
Ratio Decidendi
Section 11 of the Criminal Law Act, 1976 does not create a statutory offence of false imprisonment; the accused's explanation of coercion is not credible, and he was a voluntary participant in the robbery and related offences.
Court Disposition
guilty on counts 5, 6 and 7; counts 1, 2 and 3 cannot be considered as offences charged have been abolished by the 1997 Act
Orders
- Accused found guilty on counts 5, 6 and 7 in the Indictment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment