Fanning v. Jenkinson [1997] IEHC 114 (2nd July, 1997)
Plaintiff failed to establish exclusive adverse possession for twelve or more years; evidence did not support continuous, exclusive possession or use of the disputed bank; Defendants' paper title and rectification deed prevailed.
- Citation
- [1997] IEHC 114
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Fanning; Defendants: David Jenkinson and Miriam Jenkinson
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Civil Bill / Appeal From Circuit Court to High Court
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Boundary Dispute, Trespass
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fanning
Plaintiff
David Jenkinson and Miriam Jenkinson
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Equity Civil Bill / Appeal From Circuit Court to High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff acquired title to the disputed land by adverse possession
- 2 Determination of the boundary between the properties
- 3 Whether the Plaintiff trespassed on the Defendants' property
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff failed to establish exclusive adverse possession for twelve or more years; evidence did not support continuous, exclusive possession or use of the disputed bank; Defendants' paper title and rectification deed prevailed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim for adverse possession and boundary declaration dismissed
- Costs reserved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment