Fingal County Council -v- Gavin & Ors [2007] IEHC 444 (14 December 2007)
Fingal County Council made reasonable offers of accommodation to the defendants, and is not obliged to provide traveller-specific accommodation to non-indigenous families; the defendants' rejection of the offers does not confer a right of veto, and the Council's indigenous policy is lawful and not applied rigidly.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] IEHC 444
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Fingal County Council; Defendant: Martin Gavin; Defendant: Sam Gavin; Defendant: Michael Reilly; Defendant: Arthur Purcell; Defendant: Robert Gavin; Defendant: Terry Mongan; Defendant: Patrick Gavin; Defendant: Douglas Purcell; Defendant: Paul Gavin
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Plenary Proceedings With Counterclaim / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim granted, defendants' counterclaim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Traveller Accommodation, Statutory Duties of Local Authorities, Emergency Housing, Indigenous Policy, Trespass, European Convention on Human Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fingal County Council
Plaintiff
Martin Gavin
Defendant
Sam Gavin
Defendant
Michael Reilly
Defendant
Arthur Purcell
Defendant
Robert Gavin
Defendant
Terry Mongan
Defendant
Patrick Gavin
Defendant
Douglas Purcell
Defendant
Paul Gavin
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Plenary Proceedings With Counterclaim / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Fingal County Council is obliged to provide traveller-specific accommodation to non-indigenous traveller families
- 2 Whether the offers of accommodation made by the Council discharged any statutory or human rights obligations
- 3 Whether the defendants' circumstances constituted an emergency requiring special accommodation
Ratio Decidendi
Fingal County Council made reasonable offers of accommodation to the defendants, and is not obliged to provide traveller-specific accommodation to non-indigenous families; the defendants' rejection of the offers does not confer a right of veto, and the Council's indigenous policy is lawful and not applied rigidly.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim granted, defendants' counterclaim dismissed
Orders
- Injunction restraining trespass by defendants and others on plaintiff's lands at Thomondtown, Lusk, Co. Dublin
- Mandatory order requiring defendants and others to remove themselves, vehicles, caravans, mobile homes, scrap, waste, animals and livestock from the lands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment