McGregor & Sons (Ireland) Ltd. v. The Mining Board [2002] IESC 28 (26 April 2002)

McGregor & Sons (Ireland) Ltd. v. The Mining Board [2002] IESC 28 (26 April 2002)

The delay in instituting proceedings was inordinate and inexcusable. The High Court's jurisdiction under s.15(4) of the Mineral Development Act 1979 is a de novo application, not limited to documentary evidence. Allowing the proceedings to continue would cause manifest prejudice to the respondents, particularly due to the death of a key witness and the passage of time. The balance of justice requires the proceedings to be struck out.

Citation
[2002] IESC 28
Parties
Applicant: [First Named Applicant]; Applicant: [Second Named Applicant, deceased]; Respondent: The Board; Respondent: The Minister; Respondent: Ormonde Brick Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
26 April 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court Order Staying Application Due to Delay
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Delay and Abuse of Process, Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Review, Appeals From Administrative Decisions
Administrative Law Mineral Rights Civil Procedure Delay and Abuse of Process Statutory Interpretation Judicial Review Appeals From Administrative Decisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

[First Named Applicant]

Applicant

[Second Named Applicant, deceased]

Applicant

The Board

Respondent

The Minister

Respondent

Ormonde Brick Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court Order Staying Application Due to Delay

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants' application under s.15(4) of the Mineral Development Act 1979 should be stayed due to inordinate and inexcusable delay or as an abuse of process
  2. 2 Scope of the High Court's jurisdiction under s.15(4) of the 1979 Act—whether it is an appeal or a de novo application
  3. 3 Whether the balance of justice requires striking out the proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The delay in instituting proceedings was inordinate and inexcusable. The High Court's jurisdiction under s.15(4) of the Mineral Development Act 1979 is a de novo application, not limited to documentary evidence. Allowing the proceedings to continue would cause manifest prejudice to the respondents, particularly due to the death of a key witness and the passage of time. The balance of justice requires the proceedings to be struck out.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Order of the High Court affirmed
  • Proceedings struck out due to inordinate and inexcusable delay