Hayes -v- Kelleher & ors [2015] IEHC 509 (31 July 2015)
Ms Hayes' Ordinary Shares and Special Share entitle her to not less than 51% of votes cast at any general meeting; the number of directors may be increased by ordinary resolution; shareholders retain inherent power to appoint directors, not displaced by articles or shareholder agreement; Ms Hayes may exercise her voting rights to increase the board and appoint directors.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 509
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Freda Hayes; Defendant: Patrick Kelleher; Defendant: Robert Reardon; Defendant: Frank Kelleher
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Special Summons / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaratory relief granted in favour of Ms Hayes
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Articles of Association, Shareholder Agreements, Director Appointment Powers, Voting Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Freda Hayes
Plaintiff
Patrick Kelleher
Defendant
Robert Reardon
Defendant
Frank Kelleher
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Special Summons / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the shareholder agreement and articles of association permit Ms Hayes to exercise 51% voting rights via the Special Share
- 2 Whether the number of directors can be increased by ordinary resolution
- 3 Whether shareholders retain inherent power to appoint directors
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Hayes' Ordinary Shares and Special Share entitle her to not less than 51% of votes cast at any general meeting; the number of directors may be increased by ordinary resolution; shareholders retain inherent power to appoint directors, not displaced by articles or shareholder agreement; Ms Hayes may exercise her voting rights to increase the board and appoint directors.
Court Disposition
Declaratory relief granted in favour of Ms Hayes
Orders
- Ms Hayes may exercise her minimum 51% voting rights at a general meeting to increase the number of directors on the board of Blarney and appoint directors.
- The present upper limit of nine directors may be increased by ordinary resolution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment