N. (G.) v. K. (K.) [1998] IEHC 15 (30th January, 1998)
The Court found, on the balance of probabilities and based on credible and corroborated evidence, that P. K. was the father of G. N. Section 35 of the Status of Children Act 1987 applies, and the Plaintiff is entitled to a declaration of parentage. The Defendant's refusal to provide a blood sample did not prevent the Court from making the declaration, as the evidence was sufficient.
- Citation
- [1998] IEHC 15
- Parties
- Plaintiff: G. N.; Defendant: K. K.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Declaration of Parentage / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration granted
- Legal Topics
- Status of Children, Declaration of Parentage, Retrospective Legislation, Locus Standi, Laches
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G. N.
Plaintiff
K. K.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Declaration of Parentage / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a declaration of parentage under the Status of Children Act 1987
- 2 Whether Section 35 of the Status of Children Act 1987 applies retrospectively
- 3 Whether the Plaintiff has locus standi to bring the claim
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found, on the balance of probabilities and based on credible and corroborated evidence, that P. K. was the father of G. N. Section 35 of the Status of Children Act 1987 applies, and the Plaintiff is entitled to a declaration of parentage. The Defendant's refusal to provide a blood sample did not prevent the Court from making the declaration, as the evidence was sufficient.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted
Orders
- Declaration that P. K. is the father of G. N.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment