Thompson [A Minor] v Health Service Executive (Approved) [2025] IEHC 156 (05 March 2025)
The existence of a pending appeal under s. 22(8) of the International Protection Act 2015 does not, in itself, entitle an applicant to remain in the State or ground the grant of an injunction restraining deportation where no challenge is made to the validity of the deportation order. The relief sought constitutes a collateral attack on the deportation order and is subject to the procedural requirements and time limits of s. 5 of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000. No sufficient basis was established for injunctive relief.
- Citation
- [2025] IEHC 156
- Parties
- Applicant: G. T.; Respondents: Minister for Justice and the Commissioner of An Garda Síochána; Notice Party: International Protection Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Injunction Pending Appeal Under S. 22(8) International Protection Act 2015
- Outcome
- Application for injunction refused
- Legal Topics
- International Protection, Deportation, Subsequent Protection Applications, Injunctions, Safe Country of Origin, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G. T.
Applicant
Minister for Justice and the Commissioner of An Garda Síochána
Respondents
International Protection Appeals Tribunal
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Injunction Pending Appeal Under S. 22(8) International Protection Act 2015
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the existence of a pending appeal under s. 22(8) of the International Protection Act 2015 grounds the grant of an injunction restraining deportation where no challenge is made to the validity of the deportation order.
- 2 Whether such proceedings amount to a collateral attack on the deportation order and are subject to s. 5 of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to remain in the State pending the outcome of the s. 22(8) appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The existence of a pending appeal under s. 22(8) of the International Protection Act 2015 does not, in itself, entitle an applicant to remain in the State or ground the grant of an injunction restraining deportation where no challenge is made to the validity of the deportation order. The relief sought constitutes a collateral attack on the deportation order and is subject to the procedural requirements and time limits of s. 5 of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000. No sufficient basis was established for injunctive relief.
Court Disposition
Application for injunction refused
Orders
- Refusal to grant injunction restraining deportation pending s. 22(8) appeal
- Applicant remains subject to deportation order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment