GT v Minister for Justice & Anor [No.2] (Approved) [2025] IEHC 154 (14 March 2025)
There is no statutory or EU law requirement that a person is entitled to remain in the State pending the determination of an appeal under s. 22(8) of the International Protection Act 2015. The existence of a pending appeal does not, of itself, ground the grant of an injunction restraining deportation where no challenge is maintained to the validity of the deportation order. The proceedings, in substance, amount to a collateral attack on the deportation order and are subject to the procedural requirements and time limits of s. 5 of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000. The applicant failed to demonstrate new elements or findings significantly increasing the likelihood of...
- Citation
- [2025] IEHC 154
- Parties
- Applicant: G. T.; Respondents: Minister for Justice and the Commissioner of An Garda Síochána; Notice Party: International Protection Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Interlocutory Injunction Pending Appeal Under S. 22(8) International Protection Act 2015
- Outcome
- Injunction refused; application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- International Protection, Deportation, Subsequent Asylum Applications, Safe Country of Origin, Injunctive Relief, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G. T.
Applicant
Minister for Justice and the Commissioner of An Garda Síochána
Respondents
International Protection Appeals Tribunal
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Interlocutory Injunction Pending Appeal Under S. 22(8) International Protection Act 2015
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the existence of a pending appeal under s. 22(8) of the International Protection Act 2015 grounds the grant of an injunction restraining deportation where no challenge is maintained to the validity of the deportation order.
- 2 Whether the proceedings amount to a collateral attack on the deportation order and are subject to s. 5 of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000.
- 3 Whether there is a right to remain in the State pending the determination of an appeal under s. 22(8) of the 2015 Act.
Ratio Decidendi
There is no statutory or EU law requirement that a person is entitled to remain in the State pending the determination of an appeal under s. 22(8) of the International Protection Act 2015. The existence of a pending appeal does not, of itself, ground the grant of an injunction restraining deportation where no challenge is maintained to the validity of the deportation order. The proceedings, in substance, amount to a collateral attack on the deportation order and are subject to the procedural requirements and time limits of s. 5 of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000. The applicant failed to demonstrate new elements or findings significantly increasing the likelihood of...
Court Disposition
Injunction refused; application dismissed.
Orders
- Refusal of interlocutory injunction restraining deportation pending s. 22(8) appeal.
- No order for release from custody pending appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment