G v G [No. 2] (Approved) [2026] IEHC 92 (11 February 2026)
The undertakings offered by the father are sufficient and reasonable to secure the child's return, as there is no evidence of risk or inability of Kansas courts to address welfare and maintenance. The mother's proposed undertakings are excessive and unsupported by precedent or evidence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] IEHC 92
- Parties
- Applicant: G; Respondent: G (No. 2)
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction Under Hague Convention / Post Return Order, Determination of Undertakings
- Outcome
- Undertakings by the father accepted with minor revisions; order for return of child with 2-week stay for appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Hague Convention, Undertakings, Custody, Maintenance
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G
Applicant
G (No. 2)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Under Hague Convention / Post Return Order, Determination of Undertakings
Legal Issues
- 1 Are the mother's proposed undertakings required for the child's return under the Hague Convention?
- 2 What undertakings should the father provide to facilitate the child's return?
- 3 Do the precedents cited justify the scope of undertakings sought?
Ratio Decidendi
The undertakings offered by the father are sufficient and reasonable to secure the child's return, as there is no evidence of risk or inability of Kansas courts to address welfare and maintenance. The mother's proposed undertakings are excessive and unsupported by precedent or evidence.
Court Disposition
Undertakings by the father accepted with minor revisions; order for return of child with 2-week stay for appeal.
Orders
- Father to provide and pay for rental of property in Wichita, Kansas for 3 months.
- Father to pay $1,500 per month for 3 months for maintenance and childcare expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment