G. -v- R. [2012] IEHC 16 (12 January 2012)
CR has attained an age and degree of maturity at which it is appropriate to take account of his views; his objections to return are genuine, cogent, and independently formed. The balancing exercise between Convention aims and CR's objections favours refusal of return. This is an exceptional case due to CR's extended...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 16
- Parties
- Applicant: G; Respondent: R
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction Application Under Hague Convention / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Habitual Residence, Child's Objections, Article 13 Hague Convention, Psychological Harm, Intolerable Situation, Child's Maturity
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G
Applicant
R
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Application Under Hague Convention / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CR should be returned to the UK under the Hague Convention despite his objections
- 2 Whether CR's objections are sufficiently mature and cogent to justify refusal of return
- 3 Whether return would expose CR to grave risk of psychological harm or intolerable situation
Ratio Decidendi
CR has attained an age and degree of maturity at which it is appropriate to take account of his views; his objections to return are genuine, cogent, and independently formed. The balancing exercise between Convention aims and CR's objections favours refusal of return. This is an exceptional case due to CR's extended residence in Ireland, genuine objections, and maturity.
Court Disposition
application refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment