The DPP(at the suit of Garda Kieran D Murphy) v Gregg(a minor) [2006] IEHC 181 (13 January 2006)
The six month time limit under s.10(4) of the Petty Sessions (Ireland) Act 1851 does not apply to indictable offences under the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 tried summarily in the District Court, as such offences retain their character as indictable and are not subject to summary time limits. The legislative framework and case law confirm that only scheduled offences under the Criminal Justice Act 1951 are subject to the time limit, and the offence in question is not scheduled.
- Citation
- [2006] IEHC 181
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions (at the suit of Garda Kieran D. Murphy); Defendant: Gary Gregg (a minor)
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Case Stated / High Court Determination
- Outcome
- Question answered in the negative; six month time limit does not apply.
- Legal Topics
- Time Limits for Prosecution, Summary Disposal of Indictable Offences, Children Act 2001, Criminal Justice (theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions (at the suit of Garda Kieran D. Murphy)
Prosecutor
Gary Gregg (a minor)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Case Stated / High Court Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the six month time limit under s.10(4) of the Petty Sessions (Ireland) Act 1851 apply to indictable offences under the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 tried summarily in the District Court, where the conditions of s.53 of the 2001 Act are met and the offences are not scheduled under the Criminal Justice Act 1951?
Ratio Decidendi
The six month time limit under s.10(4) of the Petty Sessions (Ireland) Act 1851 does not apply to indictable offences under the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 tried summarily in the District Court, as such offences retain their character as indictable and are not subject to summary time limits. The legislative framework and case law confirm that only scheduled offences under the Criminal Justice Act 1951 are subject to the time limit, and the offence in question is not scheduled.
Court Disposition
Question answered in the negative; six month time limit does not apply.
Orders
- Case stated answered 'No'; proceedings not dismissed as time barred.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment