Lynch v. Burke [1999] IEHC 22 (30th July, 1999)
The Will, construed in light of extrinsic evidence and statutory principles, creates two separate discretionary trusts for Nigel and Orla Burke, and drafting errors in clauses 5 and 6 may be disregarded as surplusage to give effect to the Testator's intention.
- Citation
- [1999] IEHC 22
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Geraldine Lynch; Plaintiff: Claire Nixon; Defendant: Nigel Burke; Defendant: Orla Burke; Defendant: Liam Burke; Defendant: Dermot Burke; Defendant: Una Healy; Defendant: Richard Burke
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Special Summons / Judgment
- Outcome
- questions of construction determined in favour of plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Will Construction, Discretionary Trusts, Extrinsic Evidence, Rule Against Perpetuities, Drafting Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geraldine Lynch
Plaintiff
Claire Nixon
Plaintiff
Nigel Burke
Defendant
Orla Burke
Defendant
Liam Burke
Defendant
Dermot Burke
Defendant
Una Healy
Defendant
Richard Burke
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Special Summons / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clauses 5 and 6 of the Will are void for uncertainty or should be construed as surplusage due to drafting error
- 2 Whether the Will creates two separate discretionary trusts for Nigel and Orla Burke
- 3 Whether extrinsic evidence is admissible to resolve ambiguity in the Will
Ratio Decidendi
The Will, construed in light of extrinsic evidence and statutory principles, creates two separate discretionary trusts for Nigel and Orla Burke, and drafting errors in clauses 5 and 6 may be disregarded as surplusage to give effect to the Testator's intention.
Court Disposition
questions of construction determined in favour of plaintiffs
Orders
- Clauses 5 and 6 to be construed as surplusage or drafting error; two separate discretionary trusts created for Nigel and Orla Burke; Trust period and accumulation provisions valid; Trustees not empowered to advance to grandchildren or remoter issue; entitlement under Clause 7(b) clarified.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment