Forshall v. Walsh [1998] IESC 67 (18 June 1998)
The Supreme Court held that the trial judge was entitled to find Michael McSweeney and the Bank of Ireland liable for negligent misstatement and misrepresentation, as there was ample credible evidence that McSweeney made representations upon which the plaintiffs relied, causing their loss. The Bank's liability was vicarious. There was no contributory negligence, the claim was not statute-barred, and the plaintiffs suffered the loss claimed.
- Citation
- [1998] IESC 67
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Amanda Forshall; Plaintiff/respondent: Fine Arts Collections Ltd.; Defendant: Gerard J. Walsh; Defendant: Timothy G. McSweeney; Defendant: Willem Hoogenbrugghen; Defendant: Lambo Motors of Ireland Ltd.; Defendant: David Morrissey; Defendant: Willie Naessens; Defendant: Mary O'Brien Daly; Defendant: Edmond Cahill; Defendant: Daniel Collins t/a O'Brien Cahill and Company; Defendant/appellant: Michael McSweeney; Defendant/appellant: Bank of Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Negligent Misstatement, Negligent Misrepresentation, Vicarious Liability, Fraud, Damages, Contributory Negligence, Statute of Limitations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amanda Forshall
Plaintiff/respondent
Fine Arts Collections Ltd.
Plaintiff/respondent
Gerard J. Walsh
Defendant
Timothy G. McSweeney
Defendant
Willem Hoogenbrugghen
Defendant
Lambo Motors of Ireland Ltd.
Defendant
David Morrissey
Defendant
Willie Naessens
Defendant
Mary O'Brien Daly
Defendant
Edmond Cahill
Defendant
Daniel Collins t/a O'Brien Cahill and Company
Defendant
Michael McSweeney
Defendant/appellant
Bank of Ireland
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Michael McSweeney and Bank of Ireland were liable for negligent misstatement and misrepresentation causing loss to the plaintiffs
- 2 Whether the Bank's liability was vicarious for acts of its officer
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs were contributorily negligent
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that the trial judge was entitled to find Michael McSweeney and the Bank of Ireland liable for negligent misstatement and misrepresentation, as there was ample credible evidence that McSweeney made representations upon which the plaintiffs relied, causing their loss. The Bank's liability was vicarious. There was no contributory negligence, the claim was not statute-barred, and the plaintiffs suffered the loss claimed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment affirmed.
Orders
- Damages of £677,000 sterling and costs awarded to plaintiffs against Michael McSweeney and Bank of Ireland.
- Interest on the amount recovered affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment