McHugh -v- McHugh & Anor [2012] IEHC 75 (10 February 2012)
Plaintiff lacks locus standi to maintain claims against defendants as only personal representatives may challenge such transactions; claims are barred by statutory limitation periods under s. 9(2) Civil Liability Act 1961; inordinate and inexcusable delay further precludes action; amendments to pleadings do not cure statutory bar.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 75
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Gerard McHugh; Defendant: Myles McHugh; Defendant: Anthony McHugh
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Plenary Action / Ruling on Motions to Dismiss and Amend Pleadings
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Statutory Limitation, Undue Influence, Delay, Amendment of Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerard McHugh
Plaintiff
Myles McHugh
Defendant
Anthony McHugh
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Plenary Action / Ruling on Motions to Dismiss and Amend Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff has locus standi to challenge the deed of transfer
- 2 Whether claims are barred by statutory limitation periods
- 3 Whether inordinate and inexcusable delay precludes the action
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff lacks locus standi to maintain claims against defendants as only personal representatives may challenge such transactions; claims are barred by statutory limitation periods under s. 9(2) Civil Liability Act 1961; inordinate and inexcusable delay further precludes action; amendments to pleadings do not cure statutory bar.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed
Orders
- Defendants' application to dismiss granted
- Plaintiff's application to amend statement of claim refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment