Corcoran -v- Holmes & Anor [2006] IESC 28 (08 May 2006)
No reasonable person in the appellant's position would apprehend bias from the Board's statements, as the Tribunal will be composed of members who did not participate in the referral decision or public statements; statutory safeguards are sufficient to ensure a fair hearing.
- Citation
- [2006] IESC 28
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Donal Corcoran; Respondent: Gordon Holmes; Respondent: An Garda Siochana (Complaints Board)
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Objective Bias, Fair Hearing, Statutory Interpretation, Tribunal Composition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donal Corcoran
Applicant/appellant
Gordon Holmes
Respondent
An Garda Siochana (Complaints Board)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statements by the Board and its chairman constituted objective bias against the appellant
- 2 Whether a reasonable person would apprehend lack of a fair hearing by the Tribunal
- 3 Whether statutory safeguards under the Garda Siochana (Complaints) Act 1986 are sufficient to prevent bias
Ratio Decidendi
No reasonable person in the appellant's position would apprehend bias from the Board's statements, as the Tribunal will be composed of members who did not participate in the referral decision or public statements; statutory safeguards are sufficient to ensure a fair hearing.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- High Court order affirmed
- Application for prohibition and injunction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment