Dundon -v- The Governor of Cloverhill Prison [2005] IESC 87 (19 December 2005)
The expiry of the 60-day (or 90-day) time limit under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 and the Framework Decision does not entitle the applicant to automatic release; the duty to execute the warrant continues, and the time limits are intended for internal discipline among member states, not to confer individual...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] IESC 87
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Kenneth Dundon; Respondent: Governor of Cloverhill Prison; Notice Party: Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Habeas Corpus / Article 40.4 Inquiry / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Refusal of Release
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Time Limits in Extradition, Interpretation of Framework Decision, Automatic Release on Lapse of Time, Fundamental Rights in Extradition
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Dundon
Applicant/appellant
Governor of Cloverhill Prison
Respondent
Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Habeas Corpus / Article 40.4 Inquiry / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Refusal of Release
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether expiry of the 60-day time limit under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 and Framework Decision entitles the applicant to automatic release
- 2 Whether the time limits in the Framework Decision confer individual rights to release or are for internal discipline among member states
- 3 Whether delays caused by the applicant's own legal proceedings should be counted in the calculation of time limits
Ratio Decidendi
The expiry of the 60-day (or 90-day) time limit under the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 and the Framework Decision does not entitle the applicant to automatic release; the duty to execute the warrant continues, and the time limits are intended for internal discipline among member states, not to confer individual rights. Delays caused by the applicant's own legal proceedings are to be discounted in any calculation of time limits.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment