Ó Fallúin -v- Governor of Cloverhill Prison [2007] IESC 20 (03 May 2007)
Section 16(7) of the European Arrest Warrant Act, 2003 imposes a mandatory obligation to release a person from custody if not surrendered within ten days after the order comes into effect, unless Article 40 proceedings are pending. The existence of an appeal does not qualify this obligation, as the statute does not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] IESC 20
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Michéal Ó Fallúin; Respondent: Governor of Cloverhill Prison; Notice Party: Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Habeas Corpus / Appeal Under Article 40.4.2 of the Constitution / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Refusal to Order Release
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; applicant ordered to be released
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Detention Pending Surrender, Right to Liberty, Appeal and Effect on Detention, Interpretation of Statutory Release Provisions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michéal Ó Fallúin
Applicant/appellant
Governor of Cloverhill Prison
Respondent
Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Habeas Corpus / Appeal Under Article 40.4.2 of the Constitution / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Refusal to Order Release
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a person whose surrender has been ordered under the European Arrest Warrant Act, 2003, but who is not surrendered within the statutory period, may continue to be detained pending appeal
- 2 Interpretation of section 16(7) of the European Arrest Warrant Act, 2003 regarding mandatory release
- 3 Effect of appeal on the enforceability of a surrender order and continued detention
Ratio Decidendi
Section 16(7) of the European Arrest Warrant Act, 2003 imposes a mandatory obligation to release a person from custody if not surrendered within ten days after the order comes into effect, unless Article 40 proceedings are pending. The existence of an appeal does not qualify this obligation, as the statute does not provide for such an exception. Therefore, the continued detention of the applicant was unlawful.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; applicant ordered to be released
Orders
- Applicant to be released from custody immediately
- High Court order refusing release set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment