Singh v The Minister for Business, Enterprise and Innovation & anor [2018] IEHC 810 (21 December 2018)
The review decision confirming the refusal of an employment permit was invalid because the applicant was not afforded an opportunity to make representations on the new reasons given on review, as required by fair procedures and s.13(4) of the Employment Permits Act 2006.
- Citation
- [2018] IEHC 810
- Parties
- Applicant: Gursangat Singh; First Respondent: The Minister for Business, Enterprise and Innovation; Second Respondent: The Minister for Justice and Equality
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Certiorari and Related Reliefs
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Employment Permits, Fair Procedures, Judicial Review, Stamp 4 Immigration Status
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gursangat Singh
Applicant
The Minister for Business, Enterprise and Innovation
First Respondent
The Minister for Justice and Equality
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Certiorari and Related Reliefs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully refused an employment permit while holding Stamp 4 status
- 2 Whether the review procedure under s.13(4) of the Employment Permits Act 2006 was lawfully conducted
- 3 Whether fair procedures required the applicant to be heard on new reasons given on review
Ratio Decidendi
The review decision confirming the refusal of an employment permit was invalid because the applicant was not afforded an opportunity to make representations on the new reasons given on review, as required by fair procedures and s.13(4) of the Employment Permits Act 2006.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Order of certiorari quashing the decision of the first respondent dated 25 August 2017
- Matter remitted to the first respondent for reconsideration in accordance with law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment