H -v- H & anor [2014] IEHC 673 (19 December 2014)

H -v- H & anor [2014] IEHC 673 (19 December 2014)

The financial institution is entitled to priority over the net proceeds of the family home by virtue of the all sums due mortgage, and to an equitable charge over the French property proceeds up to the amount advanced for its purchase. The applicant is entitled to a specified sum in full and final settlement, with no further claim against the respondent or the financial institution. The respondent's obstructive conduct and delay justify the court's intervention to ensure finality and proper provision. The presumption of advancement does not defeat the financial institution's equitable claim.

Citation
[2014] IEHC 673
Parties
Applicant: H.; Respondent: H.; Notice Party: F. I.
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
19 December 2014
Procedural Posture
Judicial Separation / Ancillary Relief / Post Judgment, Determination of Notice Party Claims and Distribution of Sale Proceeds
Outcome
Claims of the financial institution for priority over sale proceeds upheld; applicant to receive €750,000 in full and final settlement; respondent to receive €127,000 and specified property interests; balance to financial institution; all other claims between applicant and financial institution dismissed;...
Legal Topics
Judicial Separation, Ancillary Relief, Priority of Creditors, Mortgage Enforcement, Equitable Charges, Presumption of Advancement, Trusts, Delay in Execution of Court Orders
Family Law Property Law Equity Banking Law Judicial Separation Ancillary Relief Priority of Creditors Mortgage Enforcement +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

H.

Applicant

H.

Respondent

F. I.

Notice Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Separation / Ancillary Relief / Post Judgment, Determination of Notice Party Claims and Distribution of Sale Proceeds

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the financial institution has priority over the proceeds of sale of the family home and French property by virtue of mortgage and equitable claims
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a share of the proceeds free from the financial institution's claims
  3. 3 Whether the respondent's conduct affected the execution of court orders and distribution of assets

Ratio Decidendi

The financial institution is entitled to priority over the net proceeds of the family home by virtue of the all sums due mortgage, and to an equitable charge over the French property proceeds up to the amount advanced for its purchase. The applicant is entitled to a specified sum in full and final settlement, with no further claim against the respondent or the financial institution. The respondent's obstructive conduct and delay justify the court's intervention to ensure finality and proper provision. The presumption of advancement does not defeat the financial institution's equitable claim.

Court Disposition

Claims of the financial institution for priority over sale proceeds upheld; applicant to receive €750,000 in full and final settlement; respondent to receive €127,000 and specified property interests; balance to financial institution; all other claims between applicant and financial institution dismissed;...

Orders

  • Applicant to be paid €750,000 from funds on deposit in full and final settlement of all claims against respondent and financial institution.
  • Respondent to be paid €127,000 and released interests in specified properties as per settlement.