Health Service Executive v Ms. A (Approved) [2021] IEHC 836 (20 December 2021)
It is in Ms. A's best interests that no further coercive treatment (including involuntary admission or naso-gastric feeding) be provided for her anorexia nervosa, given the lack of enduring benefit, significant distress, and the adverse impact on her rights to bodily integrity, autonomy, and dignity. Treatment...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 836
- Parties
- Applicant: Health Service Executive; Respondent / Ward of Court: Ms. A
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Wardship / Medical Treatment / Application for Variation of Orders Regarding Coercive Treatment
- Outcome
- Orders granted as sought by the HSE; no further coercive treatment to be provided unless Ms. A is agreeable and it is in her best interests.
- Legal Topics
- Wardship, Capacity, Best Interests, Coercive Medical Treatment, Right to Life, Bodily Integrity, Autonomy
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Health Service Executive
Applicant
Ms. A
Respondent / Ward of Court
Procedural Posture
Wardship / Medical Treatment / Application for Variation of Orders Regarding Coercive Treatment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is in Ms. A's best interests to continue coercive medical treatment for severe anorexia nervosa
- 2 Whether substituted consent should be given for coercive treatment where the ward lacks capacity
- 3 Application of constitutional rights (life, bodily integrity, autonomy, dignity) in the context of life-sustaining treatment
Ratio Decidendi
It is in Ms. A's best interests that no further coercive treatment (including involuntary admission or naso-gastric feeding) be provided for her anorexia nervosa, given the lack of enduring benefit, significant distress, and the adverse impact on her rights to bodily integrity, autonomy, and dignity. Treatment should only be provided if considered in her best interests by her treating team and if she is agreeable.
Court Disposition
Orders granted as sought by the HSE; no further coercive treatment to be provided unless Ms. A is agreeable and it is in her best interests.
Orders
- Care, therapeutic services, and medical/psychiatric treatment (including naso-gastric feeding) may be provided only if considered in Ms. A's best interests by the treating practitioner and if Ms. A is agreeable.
- No further coercive treatment or involuntary admission to be provided for Ms. A's eating disorder.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment