I.A. & ors -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & ors [2015] IEHC 324 (04 June 2015)
The Minister's decision on subsidiary protection was irrational as it failed to engage in a rational analysis of conflicting country of origin information and did not justify the preferment of one view over another. The decision-maker did not adequately consider all relevant facts and evidence as required by law.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 324
- Parties
- Applicant: I. A.; Applicant: N. A.; Applicant (minor, Suing by Next Friend I. A.): H. A.; Applicant (minor, Suing by Next Friend I. A.): J. A.; Applicant (minor, Suing by Next Friend I. A.): S. A. A.; Applicant (minor, Suing by Next Friend I. A.): A. A.; Applicant (minor, Suing by Next Friend I. A.): S. F.; Respondent: Refugee Appeals Tribunal; Respondent: Minister for Justice and Equality; Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Ireland; Notice Party: Human Rights Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Application for Certiorari
- Outcome
- Order of certiorari granted quashing the decision refusing subsidiary protection.
- Legal Topics
- Subsidiary Protection, Deportation Orders, Country of Origin Information, Credibility Assessment, Natural and Constitutional Justice, Article 3 ECHR, Article 40.3.2 Constitution, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
I. A.
Applicant
N. A.
Applicant
H. A.
Applicant (minor, Suing by Next Friend I. A.)
J. A.
Applicant (minor, Suing by Next Friend I. A.)
S. A. A.
Applicant (minor, Suing by Next Friend I. A.)
A. A.
Applicant (minor, Suing by Next Friend I. A.)
S. F.
Applicant (minor, Suing by Next Friend I. A.)
Refugee Appeals Tribunal
Respondent
Minister for Justice and Equality
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
Ireland
Respondent
Human Rights Commission
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Application for Certiorari
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister's decision to refuse subsidiary protection and make deportation orders was irrational in light of country of origin information and evidence
- 2 Whether the Minister failed to consider relevant evidence and breached natural and constitutional justice
- 3 Whether the applicant's medical condition was adequately considered under Article 3 ECHR and the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister's decision on subsidiary protection was irrational as it failed to engage in a rational analysis of conflicting country of origin information and did not justify the preferment of one view over another. The decision-maker did not adequately consider all relevant facts and evidence as required by law.
Court Disposition
Order of certiorari granted quashing the decision refusing subsidiary protection.
Orders
- Order of certiorari quashing the decision of the Minister for Justice and Equality refusing subsidiary protection to the applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment