B. -v- MJELR & Ors [2009] IEHC 447 (15 October 2009)

B. -v- MJELR & Ors [2009] IEHC 447 (15 October 2009)

Only residence in Ireland as a Union citizen in compliance with the conditions of Directive 2004/38/EC and the 2006 Regulations counts towards the five-year period required for permanent residence. Pre-accession residence as a non-EU national under domestic law does not qualify. The Minister's decision to exclude pre-accession years was correct in law.

Citation
[2009] IEHC 447
Parties
Applicant: I. B.; Respondents: Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform, Ireland and the Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
15 October 2009
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Permanent Residence Rights, EU Accession, Directive 2004/38/ec, Interpretation of National Regulations, Direct Effect of EU Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

I. B.

Applicant

Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform, Ireland and the Attorney General

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether pre-accession lawful residence counts towards the five-year period for permanent residence under the 2006 Regulations and Directive 2004/38/EC
  2. 2 Whether Article 16 of Directive 2004/38/EC has direct effect to include pre-accession residence
  3. 3 Whether Article 38(1) of the Europe Agreement or the Accession Treaty alters the calculation of qualifying residence

Ratio Decidendi

Only residence in Ireland as a Union citizen in compliance with the conditions of Directive 2004/38/EC and the 2006 Regulations counts towards the five-year period required for permanent residence. Pre-accession residence as a non-EU national under domestic law does not qualify. The Minister's decision to exclude pre-accession years was correct in law.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Application for judicial review is rejected.