A.B -v- C.D [2013] IEHC 578 (09 December 2013)
The court has no discretion to permit media reporting of proceedings governed by the mandatory in camera rule under section 34 of the 1989 Act and section 38(6) of the 1995 Act; the Oireachtas has already balanced the relevant constitutional rights, and exemptions for media reporting do not extend to bona fide press representatives.
- Citation
- [2013] IEHC 578
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: A. B.; Respondent/appellant: C. D.; Intervener/applicant: Times Newspapers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Application / Motion for Media Reporting Permission
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- In Camera Rule, Open Justice, Media Reporting, Privacy of Family Proceedings, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. B.
Applicant/respondent
C. D.
Respondent/appellant
Times Newspapers Limited
Intervener/applicant
Procedural Posture
Family Law Application / Motion for Media Reporting Permission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has discretion to permit media reporting of family law proceedings governed by mandatory in camera provisions
- 2 Whether the father's application to strike out or set aside a previous order constitutes a separate proceeding not subject to the in camera rule
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no discretion to permit media reporting of proceedings governed by the mandatory in camera rule under section 34 of the 1989 Act and section 38(6) of the 1995 Act; the Oireachtas has already balanced the relevant constitutional rights, and exemptions for media reporting do not extend to bona fide press representatives.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Times Newspapers Limited is not permitted to have a reporter attend or report on the hearing of the motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment