O' Leary -v- The Health Service Executive & Ors [2016] IECA 25 (10 February 2016)
The plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence or battery against Dr. Healy due to lack of evidence on consent and causation, and failed to prove any basis for strict liability or legitimate expectation against the State; procedural fairness was not breached by the defendants seeking a non-suit at the close of the plaintiff's case; the High Court was correct to dismiss the action.
- Citation
- [2016] IECA 25
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Alan O’Leary (a minor suing by his sister and next friend, Charlene O’Leary); Respondent/defendant: The Health Service Executive; Respondent/defendant: Ireland; Respondent/defendant: The Attorney General; Respondent/defendant: Martin Healy
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Dismissal at Close of Plaintiff's Case
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Informed Consent, Battery in Medical Law, State Liability for Vaccination Injury, Procedural Fairness in Non Suit Applications, Admissibility of Medical Records, Legitimate Expectation, Causation in Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan O’Leary (a minor suing by his sister and next friend, Charlene O’Leary)
Appellant/plaintiff
The Health Service Executive
Respondent/defendant
Ireland
Respondent/defendant
The Attorney General
Respondent/defendant
Martin Healy
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Dismissal at Close of Plaintiff's Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to record consent or warning amounts to negligence or battery
- 2 Whether the State is strictly liable for vaccine injury absent fault
- 3 Whether procedural fairness required defendants to call evidence before seeking non-suit
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence or battery against Dr. Healy due to lack of evidence on consent and causation, and failed to prove any basis for strict liability or legitimate expectation against the State; procedural fairness was not breached by the defendants seeking a non-suit at the close of the plaintiff's case; the High Court was correct to dismiss the action.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order of dismissal affirmed; no order for compensation or further proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment