Marine Hotel (Sutton) Ltd & Ors v Morris [2019] IECA 84 (22 March 2019)

Marine Hotel (Sutton) Ltd & Ors v Morris [2019] IECA 84 (22 March 2019)

The appeal was dismissed because there was no legal basis for a declaration of compliance in the absence of a dispute, the proceedings were properly left in being to enforce the undertakings if necessary, and the appellant had consented to the High Court order striking out his motion, precluding a valid appeal.

Citation
[2019] IECA 84
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Marine Hotel (Sutton) Limited; Plaintiff/respondent: Grand Hotel, Malahide Limited; Plaintiff/respondent: Aloysius Ryan; Defendant/appellant: Christian Morris
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
22 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Orders Dated 1 March 2017
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Undertakings to Court, Abuse of Process, Isaac Wunder Order, Declarations of Compliance
Civil Procedure Injunctions Undertakings to Court Abuse of Process Isaac Wunder Order Declarations of Compliance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marine Hotel (Sutton) Limited

Plaintiff/respondent

Grand Hotel, Malahide Limited

Plaintiff/respondent

Aloysius Ryan

Plaintiff/respondent

Christian Morris

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Orders Dated 1 March 2017

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in refusing to grant a declaration of compliance with undertakings
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings should be struck out as frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process
  3. 3 Whether an Isaac Wunder order should be made against the respondents

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because there was no legal basis for a declaration of compliance in the absence of a dispute, the proceedings were properly left in being to enforce the undertakings if necessary, and the appellant had consented to the High Court order striking out his motion, precluding a valid appeal.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed; no further orders made.