Donegal County Council v Quinn (Approved) (Rev1) [2024] IEHC 160 (01 March 2024)

Section 1 of the Courts (No. 3) Act 1986 (as amended) does not authorise the issue of a summons on the application of a firm of solicitors and an unincorporated body of persons; the statutory requirement for specificity and identification of the applicant implies legal personality, not a collective business name.

Citation: [2024] IEHC 160
Parties: Prosecutor: Donegal County Council; Accused: Conor Quinn
Jurisdiction: Ireland
Judgment Date: 01 March 2024
Procedural Posture: Consultative Case Stated / High Court Determination of District Court Consultative Case Stated
Outcome: Question answered in the negative; section 1 of the Courts (No. 3) Act 1986 (as amended) does not authorise the issue of a summons on the application of a firm of solicitors and an unincorporated body of persons.
Legal Topics: Issue of Summons, Legal Personality, Statutory Construction

Criminal Law Statutory Interpretation Issue of Summons Legal Personality Statutory Construction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2

Parties

Donegal County Council

Prosecutor

Conor Quinn

Accused

Procedural Posture

Consultative Case Stated / High Court Determination of District Court Consultative Case Stated

Legal Issues

1 Does section 1 of the Courts (No. 3) Act 1986 as amended authorise the issue of a summons on the application of a firm of solicitors and an unincorporated body of persons?

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Question answered in the negative; section 1 of the Courts (No. 3) Act 1986 (as amended) does not authorise the issue of a summons on the application of a firm of solicitors and an unincorporated body of persons.

Orders

Matter put in for mention to discuss ancillary or consequential matters including costs.