Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v. M. (J.) [2003] IESC 40 (9 July 2003)

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v. M. (J.) [2003] IESC 40 (9 July 2003)

The High Court erred in applying the grave risk exception under Article 13(b) by treating delay in reassessment and disruption to educational services as grave risk. Such circumstances do not meet the threshold for grave risk or intolerable situation as required by the Hague Convention. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court order and directed the return of the minors to England, subject to undertakings by the applicant.

Citation
[2003] IESC 40
Parties
Applicant/appellant: E. M.; Respondent: J. M.; Central Authority: Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
09 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Child Abduction, Hague Convention, Habitual Residence, Grave Risk Exception, Custody, Expeditious Procedure
Family Law International Law Child Abduction Hague Convention Habitual Residence Grave Risk Exception Custody Expeditious Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

E. M.

Applicant/appellant

J. M.

Respondent

Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform

Central Authority

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 'grave risk' exception under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention applies to prevent the return of minors wrongfully removed from their habitual residence
  2. 2 Whether delay or disruption in educational or health services constitutes 'grave risk' under Article 13(b)
  3. 3 Whether the High Court erred by conducting a custody hearing rather than a summary Hague Convention hearing

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court erred in applying the grave risk exception under Article 13(b) by treating delay in reassessment and disruption to educational services as grave risk. Such circumstances do not meet the threshold for grave risk or intolerable situation as required by the Hague Convention. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court order and directed the return of the minors to England, subject to undertakings by the applicant.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • High Court order set aside
  • Order directing return of minors T. M. and D. M. to England