McK -v- F & ors, McK -v- H [2005] IESC 6 (23 February 2005)
Proceedings under section 3 of the Proceeds of Crime Act, 1996 do not require the plaintiff to link property to specific crimes, are not statute barred, and are properly brought when filed within the statutory period. The appeals are dismissed as the grounds advanced are without merit.
- Citation
- [2005] IESC 6
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: F. McK.; Defendant/appellant: A. F.; Defendant: J. P. M. F.; Plaintiff/respondent: F. J. McK.; Defendant/appellant: E. H.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; High Court orders affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Proceeds of Crime, Freezing Orders, Statute of Limitations, Interpretation of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F. McK.
Plaintiff/respondent
A. F.
Defendant/appellant
J. P. M. F.
Defendant
F. J. McK.
Plaintiff/respondent
E. H.
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings under section 3 of the Proceeds of Crime Act, 1996 require linking property to specific crimes
- 2 Whether such proceedings are statute barred under the Statute of Limitations, 1957
- 3 Whether the application for a section 3 order must be moved in open court within 21 days under section 2(5) of the 1996 Act
Ratio Decidendi
Proceedings under section 3 of the Proceeds of Crime Act, 1996 do not require the plaintiff to link property to specific crimes, are not statute barred, and are properly brought when filed within the statutory period. The appeals are dismissed as the grounds advanced are without merit.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; High Court orders affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment