Donohoe -v- Irish Press PLC [2007] IEHC 264 (27 July 2007)

Donohoe -v- Irish Press PLC [2007] IEHC 264 (27 July 2007)

The action is dismissed because the delay in prosecuting the claim was inordinate and inexcusable, with no explanation provided, and the delay has caused a real and unavoidable risk of an unfair trial for the defendant due to loss of evidence, unavailability of witnesses, and insurance difficulties. The balance of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] IEHC 264
Parties
Plaintiff: Jack Donohoe; Defendant: Irish Press PLC
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
27 July 2007
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Application to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution And/or Inordinate and Inexcusable Delay
Outcome
Action dismissed for want of prosecution and/or inordinate and inexcusable delay pursuant to the inherent jurisdiction of the court.
Legal Topics
Inordinate and Inexcusable Delay, Want of Prosecution, Personal Injury, Asbestos Exposure, Fair Trial Rights, Limitation Period
Civil Procedure Tort Law Employment Law Inordinate and Inexcusable Delay Want of Prosecution Personal Injury Asbestos Exposure Fair Trial Rights +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jack Donohoe

Plaintiff

Irish Press PLC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Action / Application to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution And/or Inordinate and Inexcusable Delay

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff's action should be dismissed for want of prosecution and/or inordinate and inexcusable delay
  2. 2 Whether the delay has caused a real and unavoidable risk of an unfair trial for the defendant

Ratio Decidendi

The action is dismissed because the delay in prosecuting the claim was inordinate and inexcusable, with no explanation provided, and the delay has caused a real and unavoidable risk of an unfair trial for the defendant due to loss of evidence, unavailability of witnesses, and insurance difficulties. The balance of justice favors dismissal.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed for want of prosecution and/or inordinate and inexcusable delay pursuant to the inherent jurisdiction of the court.

Orders

  • Action dismissed