Ryan t/a James Ryan and Sons v. McManus [2005] IEHC 319 (14 October 2005)
Plaintiff established entitlement to payment for extras on quantum meruit basis; defendant entitled to set-off for proven costs of remedying defects and completing works, but not for unproven or excessive claims. Net decree awarded to plaintiff after set-off.
- Citation
- [2005] IEHC 319
- Parties
- Plaintiff: James Ryan trading as James Ryan and Sons; Defendant/respondent/counterclaimant: Brian McManus
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From County Court
- Outcome
- Decree for plaintiff for €6,252.80 after set-off; no order on counterclaim.
- Legal Topics
- Quantum Meruit, Implied Contract, Defective Workmanship, Set Off, Counterclaim, Building Contract Extras
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Ryan trading as James Ryan and Sons
Plaintiff
Brian McManus
Defendant/respondent/counterclaimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff is entitled to payment for extra works under implied contract or quantum meruit
- 2 Whether defendant is entitled to set-off or counterclaim for defective workmanship and additional costs
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff established entitlement to payment for extras on quantum meruit basis; defendant entitled to set-off for proven costs of remedying defects and completing works, but not for unproven or excessive claims. Net decree awarded to plaintiff after set-off.
Court Disposition
Decree for plaintiff for €6,252.80 after set-off; no order on counterclaim.
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded €6,252.80 with costs and certificate for counsel in both courts.
- No order on counterclaim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment