Ryan t/a James Ryan and Sons v. McManus [2005] IEHC 319 (14 October 2005)

Ryan t/a James Ryan and Sons v. McManus [2005] IEHC 319 (14 October 2005)

Plaintiff established entitlement to payment for extras on quantum meruit basis; defendant entitled to set-off for proven costs of remedying defects and completing works, but not for unproven or excessive claims. Net decree awarded to plaintiff after set-off.

Citation
[2005] IEHC 319
Parties
Plaintiff: James Ryan trading as James Ryan and Sons; Defendant/respondent/counterclaimant: Brian McManus
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
14 October 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From County Court
Outcome
Decree for plaintiff for €6,252.80 after set-off; no order on counterclaim.
Legal Topics
Quantum Meruit, Implied Contract, Defective Workmanship, Set Off, Counterclaim, Building Contract Extras

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Ryan trading as James Ryan and Sons

Plaintiff

Brian McManus

Defendant/respondent/counterclaimant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment After Appeal From County Court

  1. 1 Whether plaintiff is entitled to payment for extra works under implied contract or quantum meruit
  2. 2 Whether defendant is entitled to set-off or counterclaim for defective workmanship and additional costs

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiff established entitlement to payment for extras on quantum meruit basis; defendant entitled to set-off for proven costs of remedying defects and completing works, but not for unproven or excessive claims. Net decree awarded to plaintiff after set-off.

Court Disposition

Decree for plaintiff for €6,252.80 after set-off; no order on counterclaim.

Orders

  • Plaintiff awarded €6,252.80 with costs and certificate for counsel in both courts.
  • No order on counterclaim.