JN and TM (A Minor Suing by his Mother and Next Friend JN) v John Harraghy & Health Service Executive [2023] IESC 9 (27 April 2023)
The Complaints Officer and Appeals Officer under the Disability Act 2005 do not have the power to directly amend, vary, or add to a service statement; they may only make recommendations or determinations for the Liaison Officer to implement. However, their recommendations or determinations may include directions regarding the date for provision of services if the service statement is found to be inaccurate or incorrect. The remedial nature of the Act requires a purposive interpretation, but statutory limits must be respected.
- Citation
- [2023] IESC 9
- Parties
- Respondents: JN and TM (A Minor Suing by His Mother and Next Friend JN); Appellant: John Harraghy; Notice Party: Health Service Executive
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal Under the Disability Act 2005 / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in part; High Court error on direct amendment power corrected; jurisdiction to recommend amendment of service statement, including dates, affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Jurisdiction of Statutory Officers, Remedial Legislation, Provision of Disability Services, Enforcement of Statutory Recommendations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JN and TM (A Minor Suing by His Mother and Next Friend JN)
Respondents
John Harraghy
Appellant
Health Service Executive
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal Under the Disability Act 2005 / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Complaints Officer and Appeals Officer under the Disability Act 2005 have legal power to alter both the nature of the services to be provided and the time at which they are to commence
- 2 Proper approach to construing a social welfare statute and whether plain words may be interpreted in the light of the purpose of the legislation
Ratio Decidendi
The Complaints Officer and Appeals Officer under the Disability Act 2005 do not have the power to directly amend, vary, or add to a service statement; they may only make recommendations or determinations for the Liaison Officer to implement. However, their recommendations or determinations may include directions regarding the date for provision of services if the service statement is found to be inaccurate or incorrect. The remedial nature of the Act requires a purposive interpretation, but statutory limits must be respected.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in part; High Court error on direct amendment power corrected; jurisdiction to recommend amendment of service statement, including dates, affirmed.
Orders
- Declaration that Complaints Officer and Appeals Officer may recommend or determine that the service statement, including the date for provision of services, be amended if found inaccurate or incorrect, but only the Liaison Officer may implement such changes.
- Matter remitted for further consideration in accordance with this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment