McNulty & Anor v Diakali Ltd & Ors (Approved) [2021] IEHC 57 (28 January 2021)

McNulty & Anor v Diakali Ltd & Ors (Approved) [2021] IEHC 57 (28 January 2021)

The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate necessity or exceptional circumstances for further discovery, and the categories sought were overly broad or already refused. Plaintiffs are entitled to call witnesses without statements if a summary of their evidence is provided, as the inability to obtain statements is not within their control.

Citation
[2021] IEHC 57
Parties
Plaintiff: John McNulty; Plaintiff: Pat Leneghan; Defendant: Diakali Ltd.; Defendant: Paul Moran; Defendant: PMPT Ltd.; Defendant: Hugh O’Connor; Defendant: Ben O’Connor
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
28 January 2021
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory Motions Ruling
Outcome
Motions 1 and 3 refused; Motion 2 granted with conditions
Legal Topics
Discovery, Witness Statements, Beneficial Ownership, Commercial List Procedure
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Discovery Witness Statements Beneficial Ownership Commercial List Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John McNulty

Plaintiff

Pat Leneghan

Plaintiff

Diakali Ltd.

Defendant

Paul Moran

Defendant

PMPT Ltd.

Defendant

Hugh O’Connor

Defendant

Ben O’Connor

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory Motions Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether further discovery should be ordered against certain defendants
  2. 2 Whether plaintiffs should be permitted to call witnesses without witness statements
  3. 3 Whether discovery regarding beneficial ownership is necessary

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate necessity or exceptional circumstances for further discovery, and the categories sought were overly broad or already refused. Plaintiffs are entitled to call witnesses without statements if a summary of their evidence is provided, as the inability to obtain statements is not within their control.

Court Disposition

Motions 1 and 3 refused; Motion 2 granted with conditions

Orders

  • Refusal of further discovery as sought in Motions 1 and 3
  • Permission for plaintiffs to call certain witnesses without witness statements, conditional on providing a detailed precis of intended evidence to defendants